Regulating Chemicals (letter to Chicago Tribune)
Every American household has a stake in how the chemicals in products are regulated, especially with regard to the information that is available concerning their hazards. The troubling findings in recent reports, including the Chicago Tribune's investigative series on flame retardants and other commonly used substances, create an atmosphere of distrust and frustrate parents who want to protect their children from toxic exposure. These reports are also frustrating to government agencies that lack the data to determine the safety of these chemicals and the authority to ban substances suspected of posing a human health risk.
Our current system for testing does not serve public health well because it is patchwork in nature, slow, expensive and time-consuming, and cannot keep pace with the testing needs of new products and chemicals.
In June 2007, a report from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences concluded that recent advances in systems biology, cell- and tissue-based tests (also referred to as in-vitro testing), and other related scientific fields offer the potential to fundamentally change the way chemicals are tested. The report designed a new approach that would rely less heavily on animal studies and instead focus on methods that evaluate chemicals' effects on biological processes using cells, cell lines or cellular components. This new approach was embraced by the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institutes of Health, and the Food and Drug Administration, and these agencies, and many in the private sector, are working to make this vision a reality
Congress is actively discussing amending the Toxic Substances Control Act, the law that governs chemical safety testing.
A better testing system, which would involve regulatory changes, will yield immediate benefits and help fill the information gap that concerns American families.
— Paul A. Locke, environmental health scientist, attorney and associate professor at Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of Toxicology, Baltimore
New ALTEX: 1/2016
Promoting Dialogue Between In Vivo, In Vitro, and In Silico
May 18, 2016
Milan, Italy mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org SOT In Vitro and Alternatives Methods Speciality Section Grad Student and Postdoc Webinar
May 18, 2016
11am EDT Mucosal Immunity and In Vitro Science
May 19, 2016
Milan, Italy CAAT Academy: In Silico Modeling and Tools Under REACH
May 20, 2016
Hosted by ROCAM
in Cluj, Romania Registration and Information ACTC 2016 Conference
May 30-June 1, 2016
June 2-3, 2016
Barcelona, Spain email@example.com CAAT Academy: Animal-free Pyrogenicity and Endotoxin Testing Under the New EU Pharmacopeia Chapter 5.1.10
June 8th, 2016
17th International Conference on QSAR in Environmental and Health Sciences (QSAR 2016)
June 13-17, 2016
Miami Beach, Florida 17th Annual Congress of EUSAAT/20th European Congress on Alternatives to Animal Testing
August 24-27, 2016
University of Linz, Austria ESTIV 2016 Congress: In Vitro Toxicology for Human Safety Assessment
October 17-20, 2016
Juan-les-Pins, France AALAS 67th Annual Meeting
October 30-November 3, 2016
Charlotte, NC SAVE THE DATE:
10th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences
August 20-24, 2017