Skip Navigation

The Cosmetic Wars (NYT)

If all goes according to schedule, next month the European Union will become “cruelty-free,” banning without exception the sale of cosmetics ingredients that were tested on animals.

Don’t celebrate yet.

Because although there may be less animal testing of personal care products than there once was — even here in the United States — and many manufacturers have found new ways of determining that products are “safe,” there are still plenty of questionable ingredients in your bubble bath, many of which haven’t been tested by any means at all.

And animal testing is far from over. In fact, China officially mandates animal testing of cosmetics, which puts manufacturers in something of a bind: they won’t be able to engage in animal testing and sell in the European Union, whereas their products must be tested on animals to be sold in China. Quantum theory aside, they cannot occupy both of those spaces simultaneously.

No sane person likes the idea of subjecting animals to unnecessary cruelty. But as things stand we’re all being used as guinea pigs in the great test of new product safety. And this matters: the average American woman uses a dozen personal care products daily.

Full story at NYT

New ALTEX: 3/2014

cover.jpg
Support ALTWEB, Make a Gift
Online Humane Science Course

MeetingS

WC9: Humane Science in the 21st Century
August 24-28, 2014
Prague, Czech Republic

Symposium on Social Housing of Laboratory Animals
October 5-6, 2014
Denver, Colorado

Green Toxicology Workshop
October 23, 2014
Empa, Dübendorf, Switzerland

The Emergence of Systematic Review and Related Approaches in Toxicology
November 21, 2014
Baltimore, MD

More Meetings...

interest