ATLA::Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volume 23, Number 3

The public debate about animal experimentation.

ATLA 23, 312-316, May/June 1995

Mark Matfield

Research Defence Society, 58 Great Marlborough Street, London W1V 1DD, UK

SUMMARY

The nature of campaigning against animal experimentation and its effects on public opinion and laboratory animal welfare are examined. A three-part model is proposed in which the activities of campaigning groups form the motivation phase which, in some circumstances, can produce the second phase: change of public attitudes. This leads to the third phase: making the change, in which the animal researchers, technicians and veterinarians change their practice. The role of organizations promoting the Three Rs is incorporated by viewing their role as catalyzing the progression through the three phases. Some of the consequences of this model for the development of in vitro alternatives are examined.

Keywords: alternative methods, public opinion, animal welfare