ATLA::Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volume 23, Number 4

The impact of computer-based alternatives on the use of animals in undergraduate teachings: a pilot study.

ATLA 23, 521-530, July/August 1995

David Dewhurst1 and Linda Jenkinson2

1Faculty of Health & Social Care, Leeds Metropolitan University, Calverley Street, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK; 2Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

SUMMARY

The impact of computer-assisted learning (CAL) packages on the use of animals in university teaching has been investigated in universities in the UK and abroad. The pilot study has focused on two issues: a) academic staff perceptions of the usability of CAL packages designed to offer an alternative to animal practicals in physiology and pharmacology; and b) whether the use of such programs has led to a reduction in the number of animals used. A questionnaire survey of purchasers of a minimum of three commercially available programs which offer an alternative approach to traditional laboratory experiments, was conducted. The study found that in most departments the packages were used in a staff-supervised learning situation, to either replace or support a practical class. Their use saved academic and nonacademic staff time, and they were considered to be less expensive and an effective and enjoyable mode of student learning. It was also clear that their use had contributed to a significant reduction in animal use.

Keywords: CAL, animals saved, undergraduate teaching