ATLA::Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volume 31, Supplement 1

Two-stage testing of safety: a statistical view.

Dieter Hauschke1 and Ludwig A. Hothorn2

1Department of Biometry, ALTANA Pharma, 78467 Konstanz, Germany; 2Bioinformatics Unit, University of Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany

SUMMARY

Sample sizes given in regulatory guidelines are not based on statistical reasoning. However, from an ethical, scientific, and regulatory point of view, a mutagenicity experiment must have a reasonable chance of supporting the decision as to whether a result is negative or positive. Consequently, the sample size should be based on type I and type II errors, the underlying variability, and the specific size of a treatment effect. A two-stage adaptive interim analysis is presented, which permits an adaptive choice of sample size after an interim analysis of the data from the first stage. Because the sample size of the first stage is considered to be a minimum requirement, this stage can also be regarded as a pilot study.

Keywords: interim analysis, mutagenicity assay, proof of safety, two-stage testing